<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epicenter Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allykattales.com/2009/03/epicenter-conference.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allykattales.com/2009/03/epicenter-conference.html</link>
	<description>Everything About Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://allykattales.com/2009/03/epicenter-conference.html/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allykattales.com/2009/03/epicenter-conference.html#comment-46</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Be sure to repeat what Walvoord, Lindsey, LaHaye, Ice etc. repeat what their own teachers repeat what their own teachers repeat etc. etc. etc.!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&#039;re hilarious for being anonymous and for your comment, considering how many people quote Dave MacPherson&#039;s eight &quot;Bibles&quot; on the subject of the PreTrib Rapture, as if it was on par with God&#039;s Word.  It is almost as if MacPherson has proven his case, which he has NOT done by any stretch of the imagination.  That does not appear to matter though to those who quote him, refer to Corrie Ten Boom or Ruth Graham&#039;s letter denouncing the PreTrib Rapture position, or anything else.  The ONLY thing that matters is what God&#039;s Word says on the subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is IMPOSSIBLE to get through a conversation about the PreTrib Rapture with someone opposed to it WITHOUT hearing the name Margaret McDonald, or Dave MacPherson, so who repeats whom?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MacPherson&#039;s followers are just like him - sarcastic, denigrating and will castigate anyone who gets in their way.  Character assasinations are the norm for Mac&#039;s Buddies, as noted by some of the above comments.  MacPherson seems to specialize in that as well, calling Ice a &quot;rabid&quot; defender of the PreTrib Rapture position.  What does that make MacPherson?  Mac also called into question the genuineness of Ice&#039;s doctorate.  What a gentleman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What a loving tribute to a man (MacPherson) who started the ball rolling by creating the entire False Beginnings of the PreTrib Rapture doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He needs to humble himself, or stop writing.  His journalistic integrity (such as it is) has been questionable at best anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;Be sure to repeat what Walvoord, Lindsey, LaHaye, Ice etc. repeat what their own teachers repeat what their own teachers repeat etc. etc. etc.!&quot;</i></p>
<p>You&#39;re hilarious for being anonymous and for your comment, considering how many people quote Dave MacPherson&#39;s eight &quot;Bibles&quot; on the subject of the PreTrib Rapture, as if it was on par with God&#39;s Word.  It is almost as if MacPherson has proven his case, which he has NOT done by any stretch of the imagination.  That does not appear to matter though to those who quote him, refer to Corrie Ten Boom or Ruth Graham&#39;s letter denouncing the PreTrib Rapture position, or anything else.  The ONLY thing that matters is what God&#39;s Word says on the subject.</p>
<p>It is IMPOSSIBLE to get through a conversation about the PreTrib Rapture with someone opposed to it WITHOUT hearing the name Margaret McDonald, or Dave MacPherson, so who repeats whom?</p>
<p>MacPherson&#39;s followers are just like him &#8211; sarcastic, denigrating and will castigate anyone who gets in their way.  Character assasinations are the norm for Mac&#39;s Buddies, as noted by some of the above comments.  MacPherson seems to specialize in that as well, calling Ice a &quot;rabid&quot; defender of the PreTrib Rapture position.  What does that make MacPherson?  Mac also called into question the genuineness of Ice&#39;s doctorate.  What a gentleman.</p>
<p>What a loving tribute to a man (MacPherson) who started the ball rolling by creating the entire False Beginnings of the PreTrib Rapture doctrine.</p>
<p>He needs to humble himself, or stop writing.  His journalistic integrity (such as it is) has been questionable at best anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
